I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl Harbor, after 7 December 1941. This is
an interesting story.

http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/

Charles Lindbergh > wrote in
:

> I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl
> Harbor, after 7 December 1941. This is an interesting story.
>
> http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/
>

Was my brothers high school.

photos of the craters.

Description:
WHERE BOMB FELL: Here is one of the craters made when four medium sized
bombs were dropped from an enemy plane in a wooded area above Roosevelt
high school at about 2:10 a.m. Wednesday. Trees about the crater were
shattered by the explosion. Army men are pictured examining the crater.


http://digicoll.manoa.hawaii.edu/hwrd/Pages/viewimage.php?img=1934&famNum=1

http://digicoll.manoa.hawaii.edu/hwrd/Pages/viewimage.php?img=3020&famNum=1

http://digicoll.manoa.hawaii.edu/hwrd/Pages/viewimage.php?img=3022&famNum=1

In article >, Charles Lindbergh
says...
>
>I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl Harbor,
>after 7 December 1941. This is
>an interesting story.
>
>http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/


In addition to the Brewster Buffalo F2A (New Management post by Mitchell
Holman....5/25) here's some more pics of the plane that were referred to in the
story.




*

In article >, Charles Lindbergh
says...
>
>I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl Harbor,
>after 7 December 1941. This is
>an interesting story.
>
>http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/


In addition to the Brewster Buffalo F2A (New Management post by Mitchell
Holman....5/25) here's some more pics of the plane that were referred to in the
story.




*

In article >, Charles Lindbergh
says...
>
>I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl Harbor,
>after 7 December 1941. This is
>an interesting story.
>
>http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/


In addition to the Brewster Buffalo F2A (New Management post by Mitchell
Holman....5/25) here's some more pics of the plane that were referred to in the
story.




*

In article >, Charles Lindbergh
says...
>
>I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl Harbor,
>after 7 December 1941. This is
>an interesting story.
>
>http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/


In addition to the Brewster Buffalo F2A (New Management post by Mitchell
Holman....5/25) here's some more pics of the plane that were referred to in the
story.




*

In article >, Charles Lindbergh
says...
>
>I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl Harbor,
>after 7 December 1941. This is
>an interesting story.
>
>http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/


In addition to the Brewster Buffalo F2A (New Management post by Mitchell
Holman....5/25) here's some more pics of the plane that were referred to in the
story.




*

In article >, Charles Lindbergh
says...
>
>I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl Harbor,
>after 7 December 1941. This is
>an interesting story.
>
>http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/


In addition to the Brewster Buffalo F2A (New Management post by Mitchell
Holman....5/25) here's some more pics of the plane that were referred to in the
story.




*

Charles Lindbergh > wrote in
:

> I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl
> Harbor, after 7 December 1941. This is an interesting story.
>
> http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/
>

Gee... what was that saying? My grandfather said it a
LOT when talking about the same old gubbamin crap.

Gee... Could it have been **SNAFU**!?

Situation Normal, *All* Fooked Up

The more things change, the more things
in gubbamin stays *exactly* the same.

(Thanks for posting this C.A.L.!)

Jess Lurkin > wrote in news:nk4qn111sb3
@news6.newsguy.com:

> Charles Lindbergh > wrote in
> :
>
>> I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl
>> Harbor, after 7 December 1941. This is an interesting story.
>>
>> http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/
>>
>
> Gee... what was that saying? My grandfather said it a
> LOT when talking about the same old gubbamin crap.
>
> Gee... Could it have been **SNAFU**!?
>
> Situation Normal, *All* Fooked Up
>
> The more things change, the more things
> in gubbamin stays *exactly* the same.
>
>


as a "reward" for his excellent work , both then and after Midway
Rochefort was reassigned from cryptanalysis to command a floating dry
dock at San Francisco.

those can, do,
those that can,t bare a grudge against those that can...

" same old gubbamin crap "

On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 19:00:39 +0000, Charles Lindbergh
> wrote:

>I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl Harbor, after 7 December 1941. This is
>an interesting story.
>
>http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/

That is fascinating! Thanks for sharing the link.

Bob

That's about how well my sister parks.

The fact that she doesn't 'do' Usenet means I get to live another day.

On 19 Jun 2016 00:58:09 GMT, Jess Lurkin > wrote:

>Charles Lindbergh > wrote in
:
>
>> I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl
>> Harbor, after 7 December 1941. This is an interesting story.
>>
>> http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/
>>
>
>Gee... what was that saying? My grandfather said it a
>LOT when talking about the same old gubbamin crap.
>
>Gee... Could it have been **SNAFU**!?
>
>Situation Normal, *All* Fooked Up
>
>The more things change, the more things
>in gubbamin stays *exactly* the same.
>
>(Thanks for posting this C.A.L.!)

You are welcome!

On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 05:03:56 -0700, "Bob (not my real pseudonym)" > wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 19:00:39 +0000, Charles Lindbergh
> wrote:
>
>>I was unaware the Japanese attempted to mount a second attack on Pearl Harbor, after 7 December 1941. This is
>>an interesting story.
>>
>>http://fly.historicwings.com/2013/03/operation-k/
>
>That is fascinating! Thanks for sharing the link.
>
>Bob

You are very welcome!